Datable math
Jul. 28th, 2021 08:12 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Related to yesterday's post, apparently Dr. Kiesenhofer is currently trending on reddit in r/interestingasfuck. Little Brother is a mathematician, so DD wanted his opinion on the mentioned non-linear partial differential equations (LB has strong opinions on math, e.g. that counting is not math), leading to the following text exchange.
Me quoting DD: Is it the good math or the bad math? Where is it on math scale 1-10?
When asked to clarify: How does he feel about it? Is it in his top 5? If it were a person, would he be interested in dating it, or would he prefer other math instead?
LB: It would not be a person, but rather a family of people, I think. Most of which I'd only know via a quick glance at their public facebook profile.
There are some of them that seem a bit weird (those that have strange obsessions with existence proofs of weirder and weirder equations), but there are those who do stuff I don't understand but sounds vaguely datable.
DD: That is beautiful and exactly what I wanted to hear. Very informative.
I then explained to LB that the interest came from the topic trending on reddit.
LB: ...what.
LB: Oh, cycling.
LB: Gimme a moment to see what she's doing
LB: Sample taken: 3 abstracts. Seems perfectly datable to me.
LB: There's geometry and funny groups, which is enough to make me happy.
So that was a great start of the day xD
Me quoting DD: Is it the good math or the bad math? Where is it on math scale 1-10?
When asked to clarify: How does he feel about it? Is it in his top 5? If it were a person, would he be interested in dating it, or would he prefer other math instead?
LB: It would not be a person, but rather a family of people, I think. Most of which I'd only know via a quick glance at their public facebook profile.
There are some of them that seem a bit weird (those that have strange obsessions with existence proofs of weirder and weirder equations), but there are those who do stuff I don't understand but sounds vaguely datable.
DD: That is beautiful and exactly what I wanted to hear. Very informative.
I then explained to LB that the interest came from the topic trending on reddit.
LB: ...what.
LB: Oh, cycling.
LB: Gimme a moment to see what she's doing
LB: Sample taken: 3 abstracts. Seems perfectly datable to me.
LB: There's geometry and funny groups, which is enough to make me happy.
So that was a great start of the day xD
no subject
Date: 2021-07-28 07:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-07-28 05:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-07-28 08:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-07-28 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-07-29 01:34 am (UTC)Though statistics is probably the most data-ble. >.>
no subject
Date: 2021-07-29 08:14 am (UTC)Undoubtedly.
(All I know is that mathematical logic is very different from normal everyday logic.)
no subject
Date: 2021-07-28 07:34 am (UTC)That made me giggle, and gave me sudden flashbacks of a math teacher complaining that accounting wasn't real math.
no subject
Date: 2021-07-28 05:26 pm (UTC)And I agree with that teacher, accounting is definitely not math.
no subject
Date: 2021-07-28 10:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-07-29 08:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-07-29 08:17 am (UTC)I was making a joke, but it didn't quite translate to text. ;)
no subject
Date: 2021-07-30 09:27 pm (UTC)